Tag Archives: Amtrak

Threatened end to Blue Water and Pere Marquette

State Representative Shelley Taub (R-Bloomfield Hills), who sits as chair of the Transportation subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee has announced her intention to propose a $1 million cut in state funding of the Blue Water and Pere Marquette trains. This will be fast-tracked in budget session June 7, 8 and 9.

MDOT has stated that if this occurs, the $7.1 million requirement to operate the trains cannot be met, and both trains will be eliminated. This is because one contract with Amtrak covers operation of both trains, and there is no fair process to determine which train should be eliminated. The remainder of funds, $6.1 million, would be utilized on other rail needs in the state.

Please let your local legislators know your concern about the proposal to eliminate Blue Water and Pere Marquette train service. If this proposal is adopted by the House Appropriations Committee as part of its State Budget, the Senate is likely to go along with it. It is important to email or call your local State Representative and Senator.

Ridership on the Blue Water has increased 21% year to date April 30,2005 compared to the same period last year. The Pere Marqutee has seen an 11% increase. Michigan residents are continuing to discover the practical, financial and safety benefits of riding the train.

Please take a few minutes to call or email your State representatives now. Leaving a message on their office voice mail is effective. Remember to provide your name and address.

Use MARP’s political contact web page to look up your representative’s or sentator’s contact information. Remember the $1 million reduction is proposed by the Michigan Legislature. Contact your U.S. representative or senator about proposed federal reductions in Amtrak’s budget.

Additional key elected officials to contact are:

  • Rep. Shelley Taub
    shelleytaub@house.mi.gov
    517-373-8670 (ph)
    517-373-5868 (fax)
  • Rep. Scott Hummel
    scotthummel@house.mi.gov
    517-373-1778 (ph)
    517-373-5780 (fax)
  • Rep. Gretchen Whitmer
    gretchenwhitmer@house.mi.gov
    517-373-1786 (ph)
    517-373-5717 (fax)
  •  

      REPRESENTATIVES

      SENATORS

    Please pass this information along to others as soon as possible.

     

     

  • Sen. Shirley Johnson
    sensjohnson@senate.michigan.gov
    517-373-2523 (ph)
    517-373-5669 (fax)
  • Sen. Michael Prusi
    senmprusi@senate.michigan.gov
    517-373-7840 (ph)
    517-373-3932 (fax)
  • MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF RAILROAD PASSENGERS OPPOSES THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION’S PLAN FOR AMTRAK

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

    MARCH 24, 2005

    CONTACT: John DeLora, Executive Director or Mike Whims, Chairman
    PHONE: (313) 575-6608 or (248) 892-4545  

    Secretary of Transportation Norman Y. Mineta and the Bush Administration think letting Amtrak go into bankruptcy is the solution for intercity passenger rail. However, the Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers (MARP) views this plan weak and irresponsible.

    Secretary Mineta is visiting various cities across the U.S. talking about the Bush Administration’s plan for intercity passenger rail, which includes the “Passenger Rail Investment Act” that will soon be re-introduced to Congress. MARP feels this plan is full of holes and could leave many parts are the country without intercity passenger rail service.

    Part of the Bush Administration’s plan is to shift passenger rail funding to the individual states. This plan is weak for states to be able to afford passenger rail funding when they are suffering from budget woes. Here in Michigan, the state currently funds the operation of the Chicago to Port Huron Blue Water and the Chicago to Grand Rapids Pere Marquette, while Amtrak funds the Chicago to Detroit Wolverine Service. This year, the Michigan Department of Transportation provided $7.1 million in operating subsidies to keep the Blue Water and Pere Marquette trains running. Under the Bush Administration’s plan, those subsidies are expected to significantly increase if the state is responsible to subsidize the Wolverine Service.

    Finding dedicated passenger rail funds will be difficult for the state of Michigan and the federal government. In Michigan, it’s often an annual legislative battle to get transportation dollars while the federal government has to appropriate subsidies from the general fund for Amtrak. Secretary Mineta has not addressed where any dedicated rail passenger funding will come from.

    “Mineta commends states like California for creating a partnership with Amtrak and expanding passenger rail.” Said John DeLora, MARP Executive Director. “He (Mineta) does not mention passenger rail gets funding through a dedicated gas tax that California voters approved in the early 1990’s.”

    DeLora fears Michigan may not support a rise in gas taxes to pay for passenger rail, especially with the current fuel costs. This could mean all Michigan Amtrak could come to a grinding halt if there is no money.

    Mineta contends the long-distance Amtrak trains are the real money losers and the “anchor bringing down the entire Amtrak system.” MARP argues this is not true when the long distance trains help support a bigger network and offer transportation services to places where there are no airlines, buses, or easy access to highways. Mineta thinks it would be cheaper to give a passenger an airline ticket versus subsidizing an Amtrak train. How can this be done in cities like Port Huron, Lapeer, Durand, or Niles where there are no airports or bus services?

    The Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers is a non-profit corporation established in 1973 to improve passenger train service, travel conditions for passengers, and to work for the preservation of historic rail stations.

    For further information please contact John DeLora at (313) 575-6608 or Mike Whims (248) 892-4545 or visit MARP’s website at http://www.marp.org.

    ###

    Proposed Amtrak cuts could hurt Michigan

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    CONTACT: John DeLora, Executive Director or Mike Whims, Chairman
    PHONE: (313) 575-6608 or (248) 892-4545  

    The Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers (MARP) is deeply concerned about President George Bush’s Fiscal 2006 budget proposal. His administration proposes eliminating all funding for Amtrak, which would be detrimental to all Amtrak Michigan passenger rail services.

    Amtrak currently serves three corridors in Michigan, which include Chicago to Detroit (Wolverine Services), Chicago to Port Huron (the Blue Water), and Chicago to Grand Rapids (the Pere Marquette), with a total of ten daily trains. The State of Michigan currently funds the operation of the Blue Water and the Pere Marquette, while Amtrak funds the Wolverine Service.

    Should Congress approve zero funding for Amtrak, and then it will be up to each state to foot the bill for all operating costs. Michigan, like many other states, is suffering from budget deficits and cannot afford to make up these costs.

    John DeLora, MARP Executive Director, feels these proposed cuts make no sense when ridership is increasing on all Michigan Amtrak trains.

    “Over 600,000 Michigan passengers use Amtrak per year.” DeLora states. “It also serves several Michigan cities which do not have air or bus services.”

    The loss of Amtrak trains could hit hard on college students traveling from cities like Ann Arbor, East Lansing, or Kalamazoo, business travelers from the Detroit area, and even weekend travelers going to Chicago from Grand Rapids. The train provides the best access to downtown Chicago compared to air. Also, many travelers like to avoid the heavy traffic on the highways by riding the train.

    Congestion is getting worse on many roads and airports like Chicago’s O’Hare. Expanding Amtrak services and not eliminating it should be the goal of the Bush Administration to improve overall mobility of the country.

    The Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers is a non-profit corporation established in 1973 to improve passenger train service, travel conditions for passengers, and to work for the preservation of historic rail stations.

    For further information please contact John DeLora at (313) 575-6608 or Mike Whims (248) 892-4545 or visit MARP’s website at http://www.marp.org.

    ###

    HELP SAY “YES” FOR MICHIGAN TRAINS !

    PRESIDENT SAYS “NO” TO PASSENGER RAIL

    Passenger rail service in the United States is seriously threatened! President Bush has proposed to CUT ALL FUNDING to Amtrak beginning October 1, 2005. The national passenger rail system gives Americans a necessary travel choice to highways and airplanes, and is the ONLY intercity service to many communities without air or intercity bus connections.

    Nationwide rail travel is at record levels this year, increasing 4.3% over last year. Since September 11, 2001, rail travel is gaining national popularity and purpose. Over 25 million passengers rode Amtrak last year.

    Michigan rail ridership has been steadily increasing at double-digit percentages over the past two years. (See chart) The State of Michigan supports passenger rail service with funding for the Pere Marquette and Blue Water trains, but these trains and the Pontiac-Chicago Wolverine service will end unless Congress acts to save and expand the federal support of Amtrak.

    Contact your elected officials and let them know that you support continued funding of national passenger rail. Include a personal story about why Amtrak is important to you, if possible. See contact information below.

    Call, fax or email your elected officials (postal letters are subject to long security delays). Include the President, Congressional representatives, State leaders and your local mayor and/ or councilpersons in your correspondence.

    The President: ph. (202) 456-1111, fax (202) 456-2461, email president@whitehouse.gov
    U.S. Senate/House switchboard: (202) 224-3121 or go to www.senate.gov, www.house.gov
    The Governor: (517) 373-3400
    Michigan Senate switchboard: (517) 373-2400, or go to www.senate.michigan.gov
    Michigan House switchboard: (517) 373-0135, or go to house.michigan.gov

    Amtrak Timeliness Study Results

    September, 2004

    Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers (MARP) has conducted a timeliness study for AMTRAK trains serving the state of Michigan. The study period covers September 1 through September 30, 2004. Data for the study was obtained directly from AMTRAK’s website-based train status database.

    Data was collected by four MARP members who were each assigned specific trains: Blue Water-Kaz Fujita; Pere Marquette-John Langdon; Wolverine eastbound-Jim Wallington; and Wolverine westbound-Mike Whims. MARP wishes to thank these members for their valuable efforts.

    The study was prompted by continued complaints from passengers regarding AMTRAK’s timeliness performance. A preliminary study conducted by MARP in June-July, 2004 indicated serious timeliness delays, some of which were considered perhaps due to startup problems on the Blue Water and other non-recurring events. The September study is both a confirmatory study and a baseline against which future studies will be compared.

    The results of the September study indicate that serious deficiencies exist in AMTRAK’s ability to deliver timely service on Michigan’s ten (10) daily trains. On average, an eastbound passenger could rely on reaching a train’s final Michigan destination city on-schedule only 36% of the time, and a westbound passenger could rely on an on-schedule arrival in Chicago only 9% of the time.

    The September study results indicate that performance varies from train to train. The westbound trips are clearly less reliable than eastbound, and the somewhat subjective honor of the worst performance is shared by the Blue Water westbound and the Wolverine mid-day westbound #353 trains. In fact, anyone who rode the #353 Wolverine train never reached Chicago on time during September.

    This report includes a summary sheet of performance data by train, followed by the actual data collected by each member. Although data format used by each member differs, a standard convention is utilized where (+) indicates lateness. Also, an early arrival is counted as on time in the summaries. A cancelled train (due to freight problems for instance) was not counted in the averaging.

          MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF RAILROAD PASSENGERS				
                     September, 2004 AMTRAK Timeliness Study Results				
    
    BLUE WATER West #365 			Dp PTH	Dp LNS	Dp BTL	Ar CHI
    % of time train met schedule		90%	20%	7%	3%
    Ave. departure from schedule (min.)	0.8	32.8	45.0	71.8
    
    BLUE WATER East #364 			Dp CHI	Dp BTL	Dp LNS	Ar PTH
    % of time train met schedule		87%	10%	0%	30%
    Ave. departure from schedule (min.)	7.5	27.4	37.6	39.4
    
    PERE MARQUETTE West #371 		Dp GRR	Dp HOM	Dp NBM	Ar CHI
    % of time train met schedule		100%	7%	3%	10%
    Ave. departure from schedule (min.)	0.0	6.3	18.6	25.5
    
    PERE MARQUETTE East #370 		Dp CHI	Dp NBM	Dp HOM	Ar GRR
    % of time train met schedule		90%	28%	24%	31%
    Ave. departure from schedule (min.)	0.4	14.3	16.3	14.3
    
    WOLVERINE early West #351 		Dp PNT	Dp DET	Dp BTL	Ar CHI
    % of time train met schedule		69%	0%	0%	10%
    Ave. departure from schedule (min.)	5.1	18.9	33.1	32
    
    WOLVERINE mid-day West #353 		Dp PNT	Dp DET	Dp BTL	Ar CHI
    % of time train met schedule		38%	0%	0%	0%
    Ave. departure from schedule (min.)	14.7	26.6	46.0	42.5
    
    WOLVERINE evening West #355 		Dp PNT	Dp DET	Dp BTL	Ar CHI
    % of time train met schedule		79%	18%	3%	23%
    Ave. departure from schedule (min.)	7.5	19.6	30.4	28.3
    
    WOLVERINE early East #350 		Dp CHI	Dp BTL	Dp DET	Ar PNT
    % of time train met schedule		80%	17%	30%	30%
    Ave. departure from schedule (min.)	9.8	25.3	29.5	31.9
    
    WOLVERINE mid-day East #352 		Dp CHI	Dp BTL	Dp DET	Ar PNT
    % of time train met schedule		83%	23%	17%	20%
    Ave. departure from schedule (min.)	3.8	25.3	30.6	29.1
    
    WOLVERINE evening East #354 		Dp CHI	Dp BTL	Dp DET	Ar PNT
    % of time train met schedule		90%	20%	33%	30%
    Ave. departure from schedule (min.)	1.1	15.6	15.1	16.3
    
    Data source: AMTRAK